Friday, January 11, 2013

The 9/11 Truth Movement Is Part Of The Conspiracy

I've been writing about Alex Jones and the Tea Party and militia types recently, so naturally my blog has attracted attention from people who believe 9/11 was an inside job. Before we go further, I'd like to make my opinion on this clear: It was.

However, the 9/11 Truth Movement is a key part of the conspiracy to prevent us from learning what really happened on that terrible day. The conspiracy is older, deeper, more elaborate, and more awful than you may imagine. Truthers are unwittingly but effectively covering up the ugly facts with their ridiculous fairy tales.

Yes, fairy tales. Because the plot makes absolutely no sense. Let's say I'm in a rogue element of the US government, and I want to convince this nation to go to war. Is this easy? By 2001, the American had proven itself completely willing to sign off on an attack or an intervention anywhere on the planet. It took a speech by the president, some CNN video, a couple of rallies, and several hundred gutless members of our Congress who didn't want to sit next to Dennis Kucinich during the next field trip. Yugoslavia, Panama, Libya, Grenada, Iraq, and other places you could readily list.

But I don't want to do things the easy way, the way proven to work. I want to kill thousands of Americans and expose myself to treason charges. I want to involve multiple US agencies in my secret plot. Because obviously these things don't reliably unravel when fixers and operatives make mistakes or talk to reporters - it's not like there's a history of that happening. Plus, let's bring in Osama. Sure, he's been attacking US citizens for years by now, but he wouldn't just reveal the plan later to embarrass me and my government. It's not in him. And even though I can get his people to fly planes into buildings and incinerate thousands, that's not good enough. I want to add an element to this scheme that will in no way make it more effective, but in many, easily-discernible ways make it impossible to keep secret. I want a controlled demolition in downtown Manhattan at a time when I know that the target will be observed and videoed by millions of people. But plant a chunk of uranium somewhere near Baghdad to make sure we don't look like violent jackasses afterward? Nah. Too much of a bother.

This laughable narrative of a shadowy government group that is simultaneously brilliant and stupid, lethally effective and completely inept, and will - because it doesn't really exist - always remain outside of view... it shields the culprits in a much larger horror show. It takes people who might otherwise discover the real story and sends them chasing down corridors after something they will never catch.

The hijackers were from countries we supported, allies whose populations had a troubled relationship with us. They were part of a guerrilla force we supplied through a variety of secret means as part of a low-level global war, and as part of an even older effort by the United States to, let's use that innocuous term that hides so much in plain sight, "lead the world." They considered themselves at war with us. But our security posture was not that of a nation at war. Not at all.

Because the conspiracy, the true conspiracy behind all of this, is a plot to hide the contradictions of US foreign policy from American citizens. We need to believe we are a nation that supports self-government and the rule of law. And in a thousand places, we make exceptions. We've been doing this for quite some time - occasionally as part of an otherwise necessary military struggle. But also because we like to be in charge. To tell people what to do and to make them thank us for it. And to pretend we're doing it for their own good.

Those people, those exceptions, they become threats. They're all over the place. Many of them - the most effective ones - are wicked violent people, and we need to fight them. We do have real enemies. But unless we're willing to have a serious discussion about what exactly we've been doing in the world, and why, they're going to recruit more like them. The end result is to create the most powerful military in history, which is unable to protect its citizens. And to make the kind of friends who want to kill us.

So until we change we'll have to continue policing the world. Which is what we hate and want. We also want to keep that monster in the back of the closet. The bogeyman, the government overlord, the super villain who does those things we would never, ever support with a bump in the polls or an entire industry of feature films that glorify war.  Because that monster keeps us from facing the fact you already know:

This conspiracy goes all the way to the top.

It goes all the way back to us.


  1. You are part of the conspiracy! Screw you and your "reasonable" "analysis," you freak!!!

  2. Brilliant. Wish I'd said this first, and as well...

  3. I guess the author of the article never read the peer review paper ,that took 18 months to prepare, of lab testing by 8 Danish scientist, proving military grade nano thermite was used in the controlled demo of the building. That's peer review, as in real science.

    1. The most important word in your comment is "review."

    2. Just to clarify, the above link is about the company that publishes the journal in which this thermite paper appeared.

  4. Actually there is an alternative explanation that the conspiracy theorists do not consider, which is that a coordinated attack of which the aircraft were only a part, was used to bring down the buildings.

    An Al-Quaeda ground contingent was also present? Took over some floors of some buildings, and put the necessary? explosives in place.

    This being covered up because THEIR presence would be an even worse failure of security and source of panic for the population of the USA?

    I don't know, but it maps closer to the world of government incompetence I am familiar with than any conspiracy theory.

  5. What no intradimensional blobsquatches slipping in and out of reality placing that military grade nano thermite, that nobody can seem to produce... of course not they take it back to their dimension. No sir, I prefer my cognitive dissonance to be a little more fantastic than the world hates us cause we are the spoiled kid who doesn't like to share resources.

  6. Paul, I saw your post over in the new dungeon at DU. Since I was tombstoned back in 2010 (after 6 years of no problems my handle was John Q Citizen) for suggesting that since the republicans main goal was to get rid of Obama that the Dems should have struck a deal with the Repos to impeach Obama in return for a comprehensive single payer health insurance system, I came here to reply to you.

    We were told by 12 noon on 9/11 who did it, why they did it, and how they did it. I'm thinking that perhaps the problems with that are that we have even stooped to figure out what "it" was. We all just assume what "it" was that occurred.

    I suggest you check out this very interesting and informative presentations and then lets talk

  7. If that's what you see, then I guess for you then it is.

    But that's not what I see.

    1. I saw planes. So did a LOT of other people. They put it on some video somewhere. Any other theory has a huge, whopping burden of proof to get out of crazy territory. And this is still in crazy territory. Don't change your money. We're not past the border yet.

  8. It was weird posting with you.

    Good bye and good luck. I won't be back since there is apparently nothing to talk about. For some reason you can't view the video I posted so there is no common point of reference. And you keep referencing things (aliens, planes) that neither you nor I have posted about.

    So communication is impossible. My guess is you are a bot, not a real person. You had me going, HAL

    Steve W from Montana

  9. Of course there were planes... but two planes hit two skyscrapers - yet three skyscrapers fell down.

    A small but growing group of architects, engineers and building professionals question the official story:

    What they say makes sense.

    1. The third building burning does not take away from the fact that any controlled demolition would still have to be coordinated with two planes hitting two buildings.

      Unless you want to argue that the planes were a coincidence, you still have to explain why the conspirators had to use BOTH planes hitting buildings AND a controlled demolition.

      I have the ability to frame people who are on a plane, manufacture al-Qaeda ties, somehow get them onboard a plane, kill them off WITH ANOTHER TEAM OF SUICIDE BOMBERS... and then go to the American people with the story.

      But I can't just kill them, plant some evidence that makes it look like al-Qaeda tried a ground-level bombing of the WTC, EVEN THOUGH THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THEY DID IN 1993... and go to the American people with that, equally plausible story that is much, much easier to pull off.

      Nope. Doesn't make sense.

      Call me when you get proof, and I will take it all back.


Related Posts with Thumbnails